Skip to main content

TCOM 305 — PRINT LAYOUT AND CONTENT DESIGN

CIM Verified
English Studies
1
Objectives
10
Matches
0
Reviewed
12
Occupations
Your experience with this course
Top occupation matches for this course
45.5% Video Game Designers 12t
60.9% Graphic Designers 10t
44.6% Architects, Except Landscape and Na 9t
43.0% Interior Designers 6t
46.2% Fabric and Apparel Patternmakers 5t

Learning Objectives & Matches

LO1 CIM

Apply design principles to content layout

10 O*NET task matches
Batch:
Graphic Designers 4.5/5
61% ok

Create designs, concepts, and sample layouts, based on knowledge of layout principles and esthetic design concepts.

Tile and Stone Setters 4.4/5
60% ok

Determine and implement the best layout to achieve a desired pattern.

Art Directors 4.2/5
60% ok

Formulate basic layout design or presentation approach and specify material details, such as style and size of type, photographs, graphics, animation, video, and sound.

Graphic Designers 4.3/5
57% ok

Confer with clients to discuss and determine layout design.

Web and Digital Interface Desi
53% ok

Develop and document style guidelines for Web site content.

Web Administrators 3.8/5
52% ok

Develop or document style guidelines for Web site content.

Desktop Publishers 4.5/5
52% ok

Position text and art elements from a variety of databases in a visually appealing way to design print or web pages, using knowledge of type styles and size and layout patterns.

Graphic Designers 4.7/5
52% ok

Review final layouts and suggest improvements, as needed.

Art Directors 4.5/5
50% ok

Present final layouts to clients for approval.

Commercial and Industrial Desi 3.1/5
49% ok

Read publications, attend showings, and study competing products and design styles and motifs to obtain perspective and generate design concepts.

Source: Course learning outcomes from EWU's official Course Inventory Management (CIM) system. O*NET task matches are computed by comparing each learning outcome statement against every O*NET task statement using sentence-embedding similarity; faculty review confirms which matches count as preparation evidence.