3. Stating conclusions that are logical extrapolations from the evidence. *GE SLO#3
10 O*NET task matches
Batch:
Administrative Law Judges, Adj4.3/5
55%ok
Rule on exceptions, motions, and admissibility of evidence.
Arbitrators, Mediators, and Co4.5/5
54%ok
Rule on exceptions, motions, or admissibility of evidence.
Fish and Game Wardens4.6/5
49%ok
Compile and present evidence for court actions.
Physicists4.0/5
47%ok
Describe and express observations and conclusions in mathematical terms.
Mathematicians4.0/5
46%ok
Assemble sets of assumptions, and explore the consequences of each set.
Switchboard Operators, Includi4.5/5
43%ok
Record messages, suggesting rewording for clarity or conciseness.
Proofreaders and Copy Markers4.5/5
43%ok
Correct or record omissions, errors, or inconsistencies found.
Judges, Magistrate Judges, and4.6/5
42%ok
Rule on admissibility of evidence and methods of conducting testimony.
Government Property Inspectors4.1/5
40%ok
Examine records, reports, or other documents to establish facts or detect discrepancies.
Intelligence Analysts4.1/5
39%ok
Identify gaps in information.
Source:
Course learning outcomes from
EWU's official Course Inventory Management (CIM) system.
O*NET task matches are computed by comparing each learning outcome
statement against every O*NET task statement using sentence-embedding
similarity; faculty review confirms which matches count as
preparation evidence.
Sign in to SIAM
GitHub is available now. More sign-in options are coming.