Skip to main content

PLAN 405 — PLANNING PRESENT TECHNIQUES

5 credits CIM Verified
1
Objectives
10
Matches
0
Reviewed
12
Occupations
Your experience with this course
Top occupation matches for this course
34.9% Helpers--Production Workers 1t
32.1% Procurement Clerks 1t
30.2% Midwives 1t
31.2% Genetic Counselors 1t
32.5% Clinical Nurse Specialists 1t

Learning Objectives & Matches

LO2 CIM

(CLO is from the 2020 Accreditation report.)

10 O*NET task matches
Batch:
Education Administrators, Post 3.8/5
35% ok

Represent institutions at community and campus events, in meetings with other institution personnel, and during accreditation processes.

Helpers--Production Workers 4.0/5
35% ok

Examine products to verify conformance to quality standards.

Compliance Managers 4.0/5
35% ok

Prepare management reports regarding compliance operations and progress.

Epidemiologists 3.8/5
33% ok

Plan, administer and evaluate health safety standards and programs to improve public health, conferring with health department, industry personnel, physicians, and others.

Clinical Nurse Specialists 3.8/5
32% ok

Lead nursing department implementation of, or compliance with, regulatory or accreditation processes.

Procurement Clerks 4.1/5
32% ok

Review requisition orders to verify accuracy, terminology, and specifications.

Zoologists and Wildlife Biolog 3.4/5
32% ok

Conduct literature reviews.

Logistics Engineers 3.2/5
32% ok

Determine requirements for compliance with environmental certification standards.

Genetic Counselors 3.5/5
31% ok

Evaluate or make recommendations for standards of care or clinical operations, ensuring compliance with applicable regulations, ethics, legislation, or policies.

Molecular and Cellular Biologi 3.2/5
31% ok

Verify all financial, physical, and human resources assigned to research or development projects are used as planned.

Source: Course learning outcomes from EWU's official Course Inventory Management (CIM) system. O*NET task matches are computed by comparing each learning outcome statement against every O*NET task statement using sentence-embedding similarity; faculty review confirms which matches count as preparation evidence.