Skip to main content
Your experience with this course
Top occupation matches for this course
33.3% Special Education Teachers, Seconda 3t
33.9% Special Education Teachers, Middle 3t
32.3% Special Education Teachers, Element 3t
33.5% Motorboat Operators 1t
32.3% Brickmasons and Blockmasons 1t

Learning Objectives & Matches

LO3 CIM

We recognize that GEC suggests different SLOs for sequential courses, but this would force the course to be something different than it is or should be.

10 O*NET task matches
Batch:
English Language and Literatur 3.8/5
42% ok

Schedule courses.

Operations Research Analysts 4.3/5
37% ok

Study and analyze information about alternative courses of action to determine which plan will offer the best outcomes.

Directors, Religious Activitie 4.1/5
37% ok

Select appropriate curricula or class structures for educational programs.

Area, Ethnic, and Cultural Stu 3.2/5
34% ok

Incorporate experiential or site visit components into courses.

Special Education Teachers, Mi 4.3/5
34% ok

Modify the general education curriculum for students with disabilities, based upon a variety of instructional techniques and instructional technology.

Motorboat Operators 4.6/5
34% ok

Maintain desired courses, using compasses or electronic navigational aids.

Special Education Teachers, Se 4.2/5
33% ok

Modify the general education curriculum for students with disabilities, based upon a variety of instructional techniques and technologies.

Exercise Trainers and Group Fi 4.8/5
33% ok

Offer alternatives during classes to accommodate different levels of fitness.

Brickmasons and Blockmasons 4.3/5
32% ok

Calculate angles and courses and determine vertical and horizontal alignment of courses.

Special Education Teachers, El 4.7/5
32% ok

Modify the general elementary education curriculum for students with disabilities.

Source: Course learning outcomes from EWU's official Course Inventory Management (CIM) system. O*NET task matches are computed by comparing each learning outcome statement against every O*NET task statement using sentence-embedding similarity; faculty review confirms which matches count as preparation evidence.