Skip to main content

MATH 114 — ALGEBRA CONCEPTS

CIM Verified
1
Objectives
10
Matches
0
Reviewed
12
Occupations
Your experience with this course
Top occupation matches for this course
35.2% Computer Programmers 5t
34.4% Fabric and Apparel Patternmakers 3t
36.4% Music Directors and Composers 3t
35.5% Actors 3t
44.0% Craft Artists 3t

Learning Objectives & Matches

LO2 CIM

Describe, create, and use functions in multiple representations.

10 O*NET task matches
Batch:
Substance Abuse and Behavioral 4.3/5
50% ok

Instruct others in program methods, procedures, or functions.

Data Scientists
49% ok

Write new functions or applications in programming languages to conduct analyses.

Landscape Architects 4.2/5
45% ok

Prepare graphic representations or drawings of proposed plans or designs.

Craft Artists 3.5/5
44% ok

Create prototypes or models of objects to be crafted.

Mechanical Drafters 4.3/5
43% ok

Lay out and draw schematic, orthographic, or angle views to depict functional relationships of components, assemblies, systems, and machines.

Architects, Except Landscape a 3.8/5
42% ok

Create three-dimensional or interactive representations of designs, using computer-assisted design software.

Patternmakers, Metal and Plast 3.8/5
42% ok

Read and interpret blueprints or drawings of parts to be cast or patterns to be made, compute dimensions, and plan operational sequences.

Mathematicians 3.9/5
41% ok

Address the relationships of quantities, magnitudes, and forms through the use of numbers and symbols.

Fuel Cell Engineers 4.1/5
40% ok

Characterize component or fuel cell performances by generating operating maps, defining operating conditions, identifying design refinements, or executing durability assessments.

Aircraft Structure, Surfaces, 4.4/5
39% ok

Read blueprints, illustrations, or specifications to determine layouts, sequences of operations, or identities or relationships of parts.

Source: Course learning outcomes from EWU's official Course Inventory Management (CIM) system. O*NET task matches are computed by comparing each learning outcome statement against every O*NET task statement using sentence-embedding similarity; faculty review confirms which matches count as preparation evidence.