Skip to main content

EXSC 488 — PROFESSIONAL INTERNSHIP (variable credit course–must complete 15 credits–minimum grade ≥B)

CIM Verified
Exercise Science
1
Objectives
10
Matches
0
Reviewed
12
Occupations
Your experience with this course
Top occupation matches for this course
37.0% Proofreaders and Copy Markers 2t
32.7% Management Analysts 2t
30.3% File Clerks 1t
32.2% First-Line Supervisors of Housekeep 1t
30.0% Radio Frequency Identification Devi 1t

Learning Objectives & Matches

LO1 CIM

Nothing changed except that EXSC 301 was added as a prerequisite.

10 O*NET task matches
Batch:
Proofreaders and Copy Markers 4.0/5
37% ok

Consult with authors and editors regarding manuscript changes and suggestions.

Cartographers and Photogrammet 4.2/5
35% ok

Revise existing maps and charts, making all necessary corrections and adjustments.

Quality Control Systems Manage 4.3/5
34% ok

Review and update standard operating procedures or quality assurance manuals.

Transportation, Storage, and D 3.8/5
34% ok

Prepare management recommendations, such as proposed fee and tariff increases or schedule changes.

Geodetic Surveyors 3.8/5
33% ok

Review existing standards, controls, or equipment used, recommending changes or upgrades as needed.

Management Analysts 4.2/5
33% ok

Document findings of study and prepare recommendations for implementation of new systems, procedures, or organizational changes.

Management Analysts 3.2/5
32% ok

Design, evaluate, recommend, and approve changes of forms and reports.

First-Line Supervisors of Hous 3.8/5
32% ok

Recommend changes that could improve service and increase operational efficiency.

Web Administrators 4.0/5
32% ok

Document application and Web site changes or change procedures.

Computer Programmers 4.4/5
32% ok

Perform or direct revision, repair, or expansion of existing programs to increase operating efficiency or adapt to new requirements.

Source: Course learning outcomes from EWU's official Course Inventory Management (CIM) system. O*NET task matches are computed by comparing each learning outcome statement against every O*NET task statement using sentence-embedding similarity; faculty review confirms which matches count as preparation evidence.