Skip to main content

ECON 457 — ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY

CIM Verified
1
Objectives
10
Matches
0
Reviewed
12
Occupations
Your experience with this course
Top occupation matches for this course
55.5% Economists 8t
40.7% Environmental Economists 6t
38.0% Customs Brokers 4t
44.3% Securities, Commodities, and Financ 3t
32.9% Budget Analysts 3t

Learning Objectives & Matches

LO3 CIM

LO 3: Evaluate the economic effects of external market shocks and changes in policy regimes.

10 O*NET task matches
Batch:
Economists 4.0/5
55% ok

Explain economic impact of policies to the public.

Securities, Commodities, and F 4.1/5
44% ok

Track and analyze factors that affect price movement, such as trade policies, weather conditions, political developments, or supply and demand changes.

Economists 3.9/5
42% ok

Formulate recommendations, policies, or plans to solve economic problems or to interpret markets.

Economists 4.2/5
42% ok

Study the socioeconomic impacts of new public policies, such as proposed legislation, taxes, services, and regulations.

Economists 3.8/5
42% ok

Develop economic guidelines and standards, and prepare points of view used in forecasting trends and formulating economic policy.

Economists 4.2/5
41% ok

Compile, analyze, and report data to explain economic phenomena and forecast market trends, applying mathematical models and statistical techniques.

Environmental Economists 4.2/5
41% ok

Collect and analyze data to compare the environmental implications of economic policy or practice alternatives.

Business Intelligence Analysts 3.9/5
39% ok

Identify and analyze industry or geographic trends with business strategy implications.

Economics Teachers, Postsecond 4.5/5
39% ok

Prepare and deliver lectures to undergraduate or graduate students on topics such as econometrics, price theory, and macroeconomics.

Political Scientists 3.0/5
39% ok

Forecast political, economic, and social trends.

Source: Course learning outcomes from EWU's official Course Inventory Management (CIM) system. O*NET task matches are computed by comparing each learning outcome statement against every O*NET task statement using sentence-embedding similarity; faculty review confirms which matches count as preparation evidence.