Skip to main content

CRWR 469 — LITERATURE OF THE PNW

CIM Verified
1
Objectives
10
Matches
0
Reviewed
12
Occupations
Your experience with this course
Top occupation matches for this course
43.9% News Analysts, Reporters, and Journ 16t
59.2% Poets, Lyricists and Creative Write 8t
48.2% Editors 6t
44.2% English Language and Literature Tea 6t
42.6% Technical Writers 4t

Learning Objectives & Matches

LO1 CIM

Analyze works of fiction, poetry, and nonfiction by writers based in the Pacific NW.

10 O*NET task matches
Batch:
Poets, Lyricists and Creative 4.7/5
59% ok

Write fiction or nonfiction prose, such as short stories, novels, biographies, articles, descriptive or critical analyses, and essays.

Editors 4.1/5
48% ok

Write text, such as stories, articles, editorials, or newsletters.

Librarians and Media Collectio 4.4/5
45% ok

Check books in and out of the library.

Correspondence Clerks 4.0/5
45% ok

Read incoming correspondence to ascertain nature of writers' concerns and to determine disposition of correspondence.

Materials Engineers 3.2/5
45% ok

Write for technical magazines, journals, and trade association publications.

English Language and Literatur 4.2/5
44% ok

Prepare and deliver lectures to undergraduate or graduate students on topics such as poetry, novel structure, and translation and adaptation.

News Analysts, Reporters, and 4.0/5
44% ok

Determine a published or broadcasted story's emphasis, length, and format, organizing material accordingly.

Librarians and Media Collectio 3.6/5
43% ok

Compile lists of books, periodicals, articles, and audio-visual materials on particular subjects.

Archivists 3.1/5
43% ok

Select and edit documents for publication and display, applying knowledge of subject, literary expression, and presentation techniques.

Technical Writers 3.9/5
43% ok

Assist in laying out material for publication.

Source: Course learning outcomes from EWU's official Course Inventory Management (CIM) system. O*NET task matches are computed by comparing each learning outcome statement against every O*NET task statement using sentence-embedding similarity; faculty review confirms which matches count as preparation evidence.