Skip to main content

CRWR 312 — FORM AND THEORY OF POETRY

CIM Verified
1
Objectives
10
Matches
0
Reviewed
12
Occupations
Your experience with this course
Top occupation matches for this course
48.2% Music Directors and Composers 11t
46.6% Art Therapists 5t
33.0% Graphic Designers 5t
35.4% Musicians and Singers 4t
36.0% Choreographers 4t

Learning Objectives & Matches

LO1 CIM

Analyze contemporary poetry texts for the use of craft elements including:  form, sound, and imagery.

10 O*NET task matches
Batch:
Music Directors and Composers 3.5/5
48% ok

Transcribe musical compositions and melodic lines to adapt them to a particular group, or to create a particular musical style.

Art Therapists 3.8/5
47% ok

Instruct individuals or groups in the use of art media, such as paint, clay, or yarn.

Music Directors and Composers 4.2/5
47% ok

Transcribe ideas for musical compositions into musical notation, using instruments, pen and paper, or computers.

Art Therapists 4.1/5
43% ok

Interpret the artistic creations of clients to assess their functioning, needs, or progress.

English Language and Literatur 4.2/5
42% ok

Prepare and deliver lectures to undergraduate or graduate students on topics such as poetry, novel structure, and translation and adaptation.

Music Directors and Composers 3.8/5
41% ok

Fill in details of orchestral sketches, such as adding vocal parts to scores.

Craft Artists 4.6/5
41% ok

Develop concepts or creative ideas for craft objects.

Music Directors and Composers 3.4/5
41% ok

Create original musical forms, or write within circumscribed musical forms such as sonatas, symphonies, or operas.

Music Directors and Composers 4.5/5
40% ok

Apply elements of music theory to create musical and tonal structures, including harmonies and melodies.

Fine Artists, Including Painte 4.5/5
39% ok

Use materials such as pens and ink, watercolors, charcoal, oil, or computer software to create artwork.

Source: Course learning outcomes from EWU's official Course Inventory Management (CIM) system. O*NET task matches are computed by comparing each learning outcome statement against every O*NET task statement using sentence-embedding similarity; faculty review confirms which matches count as preparation evidence.