Skip to main content

CMST 312 — NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION

CIM Verified
Dental Hygiene
1
Objectives
10
Matches
0
Reviewed
12
Occupations
Your experience with this course
Top occupation matches for this course
44.3% Speech-Language Pathology Assistant 4t
43.2% Audiologists 4t
33.2% Music Therapists 4t
42.7% Actors 4t
46.3% Switchboard Operators, Including An 3t

Learning Objectives & Matches

LO7 CIM

4. To help you understand how nonverbal communication can affect verbal messages.

10 O*NET task matches
Batch:
Speech-Language Pathologists 4.5/5
51% ok

Instruct clients in techniques for more effective communication, such as sign language, lip reading, or voice improvement.

Switchboard Operators, Includi 4.5/5
46% ok

Record messages, suggesting rewording for clarity or conciseness.

Speech-Language Pathologists 4.4/5
46% ok

Consult with and advise educators or medical staff on speech or hearing topics, such as communication strategies or speech and language stimulation.

Court Reporters and Simultaneo 4.8/5
46% ok

Ask speakers to clarify inaudible statements.

Speech-Language Pathology Assi 4.5/5
44% ok

Select or prepare speech-language instructional materials.

Audiologists 4.6/5
43% ok

Instruct patients, parents, teachers, or employers in communication strategies to maximize effective receptive communication.

Actors 4.7/5
43% ok

Portray and interpret roles, using speech, gestures, and body movements, to entertain, inform, or instruct radio, film, television, or live audiences.

Switchboard Operators, Includi 4.7/5
41% ok

Answer incoming calls, greeting callers, providing information, transferring calls or taking messages as necessary.

Home Health Aides 4.1/5
41% ok

Entertain, converse with, or read aloud to patients to keep them mentally healthy and alert.

Animal Trainers 4.5/5
40% ok

Talk to or interact with animals to familiarize them to human voices or contact.

Source: Course learning outcomes from EWU's official Course Inventory Management (CIM) system. O*NET task matches are computed by comparing each learning outcome statement against every O*NET task statement using sentence-embedding similarity; faculty review confirms which matches count as preparation evidence.